indifferentketchup/boocode
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs(changelog): v2.6.7-interrupt-guard + reconcile roadmap/review/openspec

Browse Source 
CHANGELOG entry for v2.6.7. Plus the session's doc reconciliation: roadmap shipped record synced through v2.6.7 (v2.3 lifecycle marked shipped, relicense AGPL->MIT batch, fork-sweep lift items, claude-agent-sdk SessionStore, ACP package fix); boocode_code_review_v2 (two fork sweeps, relicense decision = 3 AGPL files, jinja gate green); openspec v2-3 reconciled to shipped (v2.5.4-v2.5.13); openspec v2-6 Phase 0/1 + P1.5 shipped, F.1 done, remaining-phase plan + lift sources.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
indifferentketchup
2026-05-31 21:31:47 +00:00
parent 372651bcb1
commit 457010391a
9 changed files with 234 additions and 135 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
openspec/changes/v2-3-provider-lifecycle/proposal.md
View File

@@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
# v2.3 Provider lifecycle (Paseo-style registry)
**Status:** Planned
**Status:** ✅ **Shipped** across `v2.5.4`–`v2.5.13` (2026-05-29; reconciled 2026-05-31) — all 6 phases live; only the 3 optional Tier-2 items deferred
**Depends on:** v2.2 Paseo providers (snapshot, modes, commands, ACP dispatch)
**Reference fork:** `/opt/forks/paseo`
**Related deferred work:** [`docs/DEFERRED-WORK.md`](../../../docs/DEFERRED-WORK.md) §2 (cold-probe skip)
> **Shipped mapping (reconciled 2026-05-31):** Phase 1 → `v2.5.4`, Phase 2 → `v2.5.5`, Phase 3 → `v2.5.6`, Phase 4 → `v2.5.12`, Phase 5 → `v2.5.13`, Phase 6 docs → `v2.5.13`/`v2.5.14`. **Deferred (tasks O.1–O.3):** WS `provider_snapshot_updated` frame, `available_agents.enabled` column, diagnostic row-click modal — tracked in `docs/DEFERRED-WORK.md`. (Cursor was retired in `v2.5.3`, so the success-criterion mention below is historical.)
## Why
BooCode v2.2 copied Paseo’s **snapshot wire shape** (modes, thinking, commands) but not Paseo’s **provider lifecycle**:
@@ -46,12 +48,12 @@ Paseo’s model (see `/opt/forks/paseo/public-docs/providers.md`) treats provide
## Success criteria
- Add `amp-acp` via catalog → appears in picker after refresh without coder redeploy
- Disable goose in settings → gone from picker, still visible as “Disabled” in settings
- opencode not on PATH → shows “Not installed” in settings, hidden from picker
- Second snapshot open within warm window completes in &lt;500ms (no ACP spawns)
- `POST /api/providers/refresh` still runs full cold probe
- Existing v2.2 dispatch (cursor, opencode, claude, qwen) unchanged for built-ins
- ✅ Add `amp-acp` via catalog → appears in picker after refresh without coder redeploy *(catalog smoke-test entry; per `boocode_code_review_v2.md` §5m, Amp itself is paid-cloud, not a usable local provider)*
- ✅ Disable goose in settings → gone from picker, still visible as “Disabled” in settings
- ✅ opencode not on PATH → shows “Not installed” in settings, hidden from picker
- ✅ Second snapshot open within warm window completes in &lt;500ms (no ACP spawns)
- ✅ `POST /api/providers/refresh` still runs full cold probe
- ✅ Existing v2.2 dispatch unchanged for built-ins *(opencode, claude, qwen, goose — cursor + copilot retired `v2.5.3`)*
## Deliverables