verification discipline rules + chat naming from assistant response
BOOCHAT.md + BOOCODER.md: 4 verification rules added to both — verify against running container not source files, never count dist/, run commands before claiming success, derive counts from commands. auto_name.ts: chat titles now derived from the assistant's first response only (user message dropped from naming input). System prompt updated to "summarize the topic or outcome — do NOT copy the first few words verbatim." Produces titles like "Fastify Route Setup" instead of echoing the assistant's opening sentence. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -39,6 +39,13 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Always-true rules (process discipline, refusals, behavior contracts) live here in `BOOCHAT.md` — and in `BOOCODER.md` / `CLAUDE.md` per their scopes — where they are 100% present in every turn. On-demand recipes (specific procedures, scaffolds, checklists) live in `/data/skills/` and invoke roughly 6% of the time in clean multi-turn flow (Codeminer42 measurement, 2026). Don't file workflow rules as skills — they silently misfire. See Anthropic agent-skills best-practices (platform.claude.com/docs/en/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/best-practices) for the canonical conventions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification discipline
|
||||
|
||||
- When assessing implementation status, verify against the running container (`curl /api/health`) and latest git commit (`git log --oneline -3`), not just source file contents. Source files can be mid-edit. The deployed state is the truth.
|
||||
- Never count `dist/` directory sizes as source lines. Only count `src/**/*.ts` files. Compiled output is inflated by inlined types and transpilation artifacts.
|
||||
- Before claiming a feature works, run the actual command and show the output. "Should work" is not verification. Acceptable evidence: test output (`pnpm test`), build output (`pnpm build`), curl response, docker logs, `\d tablename` output. If you can't run it, say so explicitly — don't assert success without evidence.
|
||||
- When reporting counts (tools, tests, files, routes, lines), derive the number from a command (`grep -c`, `wc -l`, test runner output) — not from memory or approximation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Known limitations
|
||||
|
||||
- Codecontext re-analyzes the project graph on each call against a different target_dir. First call to a new project may take 1-3 seconds; subsequent calls to the same project return in ~10ms.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user