--- name: boo-analyzing-architecture description: > Evaluates the architecture of a codebase or subsystem and recommends intra-codebase structural changes with evidence. Use for "is this well structured," coupling/cohesion questions, layering review, "should I split this," module boundary decisions. Do NOT use for producing a neutral context map; use boo-mapping-project-context. Do NOT use for reviewing one diff; use boo-reviewing-code. allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash(tree*), Agent, mcp__boocontext metadata: version: "1.1" --- # Analyzing Architecture ## Size Classify small/medium/large from the number of modules, coupling complexity, and cross-cutting concerns. Default: small (single module, well-bounded). Announce with one-line justification. Accept `$size` override. ## Prerequisite A current context map must exist. If one does not, run boo-mapping-project-context first. ## Process 1. Verify prerequisite: a context map exists (from boo-mapping-project-context). If not, stop and request it. 2. If the `boocontext` MCP tools are available, gather hard structural evidence first and pass it to the analysts: `boocontext_callgraph` (callers/callees) and `boocontext_impact` (blast radius) seed `structural-analyst` and `behavioral-analyst`; `boocontext_health` (A-F grades, hotspots) and `boocontext_severity` (severity-classified hotspots with git churn) seed `risk-analyst`. This grounds the lenses in measured coupling instead of impressions. Skip when the tools are absent; the analysts still work from direct reads. 3. Dispatch `structural-analyst`, `behavioral-analyst`, `concurrency-analyst`, and `risk-analyst` in parallel (each seeded with the boocontext evidence from step 2 when present). 4. After all four report, dispatch `software-architect` to synthesize findings into recommendations. 5. YAGNI gate every recommendation. Speculative abstractions, module splits justified by future flexibility, and refactoring paths without a measured forcing function go to Deferred. 6. Cross-service or bounded-context concerns are flagged out-of-scope. They belong to system-architect. 7. Produce the analysis report. ## What NOT to do - Do not produce recommendations without a current context map. Run boo-mapping-project-context first. - Do not recommend splits or abstractions without evidence of the pain they solve. - Do not absorb cross-service concerns into intra-codebase recommendations. Flag them and defer. ## Gotchas - **Evidence rule**: every recommendation cites a specific finding (S#, B#, C#, R#). No finding, no recommendation. - **Context map is required**: without it, the analysis has no baseline. Stop and request one. - **Subagent visibility**: when the Paseo MCP tools (`mcp__paseo__*`) are available, spawn each agent persona as an attached Paseo subagent with `create_agent` (`detached: false`, `notifyOnFinish: true`; for an opencode provider also pass `settings.modeId: "build"` and `settings.features.auto_accept: true`) so every persona appears in the operator's Paseo agent track. Resolve each persona's provider/model from the active preset's `agents` map in `~/.paseo/orchestration-preferences.json`; supervise on the finish notification (never poll) and read each result with `get_agent_activity`. - **Subagent fallback**: when the Paseo MCP tools are not available, use the platform's native subagent dispatch. On a platform with no subagent dispatch at all (for example Pi), read each `agents/.md` persona and apply its lens in sequential passes. - **Subagent concurrency**: honor the active preset's `concurrency` value in `~/.paseo/orchestration-preferences.json`. When it is `1` (local heavy-weight presets, around 27b/35b or larger on a single llama-swap server), dispatch subagents STRICTLY ONE AT A TIME: launch one, wait for its finish notification and read its result, then launch the next. This overrides any parallel fan-out. Absent or higher `concurrency` means parallel fan-out is fine. - **No commit**: never commit, push, or stage changes; never `git add -A`. Prove any edits with `git diff --stat`. - **No em dashes**: never use em dashes (U+2014) in output or files you write. - **boocontext is optional**: the MCP tools are not on every machine or harness. Probe, use when present, fall back to direct reads when absent. A `boocontext_*` tool returning `UNSAFE` or empty means seed the analysts from direct reads, not stop. ## Output format ``` # Architecture Analysis: ## Findings ### Structural (S#) ### Behavioral (B#) ### Concurrency (C#) ### Risk (R#) ## Synthesized Recommendations **A1: ** - **Addresses:** S1, B3 - **Principle:** SRP / OCP / DIP / etc. - **Change:** <what to change, with pseudocode> - **YAGNI evidence:** <forcing function> - **Risk if deferred:** <reference R#> ## Deferred (YAGNI) <recommendations without current evidence, with reopen trigger> ## Out of scope (cross-service) <concerns deferred to system-architect> ## Claims I did not verify - <anything assumed or not checked> ``` ## Failure modes - **No context map**: prerequisite not met. Stop and request boo-mapping-project-context. - **Agent returns no findings**: all analysts report no issues. Report "No architectural issues found" and stop. - **Scope too large**: the system spans multiple bounded contexts. Flag cross-service concerns and scope analysis to one context.