Files
boocode/openspec
indifferentketchup 457010391a docs(changelog): v2.6.7-interrupt-guard + reconcile roadmap/review/openspec
CHANGELOG entry for v2.6.7. Plus the session's doc reconciliation: roadmap shipped record synced through v2.6.7 (v2.3 lifecycle marked shipped, relicense AGPL->MIT batch, fork-sweep lift items, claude-agent-sdk SessionStore, ACP package fix); boocode_code_review_v2 (two fork sweeps, relicense decision = 3 AGPL files, jinja gate green); openspec v2-3 reconciled to shipped (v2.5.4-v2.5.13); openspec v2-6 Phase 0/1 + P1.5 shipped, F.1 done, remaining-phase plan + lift sources.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-31 21:31:47 +00:00
..

openspec

Per-batch documentation convention adopted v1.13.15-openspec.

Agent entry point: AGENTS.md at repo root. Architecture diagram: docs/ARCHITECTURE.md.

Lift source: Fission-AI/OpenSpec directory layout. No CLI dependency — just the folder shape. Full OpenSpec lifecycle adoption is a future v1.14+ batch.

Layout

openspec/
  changes/
    <slug>/                          # one folder per shipped or planned batch
      proposal.md                    # Why + scope summary
      tasks.md                       # implementation step list
      design.md                      # architecture / data-model decisions (optional)
      specs/                         # reserved for future OpenSpec CLI adoption
    archived/                        # snapshots of pre-v1.13.15 batch docs
      <original-filename>.md
  specs/                             # global specs, future v1.14+ use

Conventions

  • Slugs are lowercase-hyphenated derived from the batch title (e.g. v1-13-10-per-tool-cost, file-attachments-v3-5).
  • Already-shipped pre-v1.13.15 batches live in changes/archived/ as single-file snapshots. They were not split into proposal/tasks because the work was already complete; archiving preserves git history.
  • New v1.13.15+ batches should land directly in changes/<slug>/proposal.md (+ tasks.md, + design.md when applicable).
  • proposal.md carries the "Why" and scope. tasks.md is the action list (numbered or checkbox). design.md is for non-trivial architectural decisions worth recording separately.
  • A canonical dispatch brief (matching the v1.13.9 / v1.13.10 format) is most naturally split as proposal.md (Where we are, Why this matters, rationale sections) + tasks.md (Scope items, Build + smoke) + design.md (Attribution model, Filtering, Canonical mapping).